Personality
Corporate Personality, Capacity, and Attribution
Separate legal personality, corporate capacity, agency, attribution of knowledge, and exceptional disregard of corporate personality through veil-piercing, facade, evasion, concealment, or ordinary private-law analysis.
Companies Ordinance Cap. 622Transfer of Business (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance Cap. 49Common law attribution and veil-piercing principles
Research questions
- When does the company bear responsibility for the knowledge or misconduct of its officers?
- How do attribution rules interact with fraud, insolvency, and shareholder remedies?
- When is interposition of a company an evasion of an existing legal obligation rather than permissible liability planning?
- Can agency, trust, transfer-of-business, or attribution principles solve the problem without piercing the veil?
Selected sources
Ordinance Foundational 2014
Cap. 622
The central statute for Hong Kong incorporated companies, covering incorporation, administration, share capital, directors, members, remedies, schemes, and registered non-Hong Kong companies.
IncorporationPersonalityConstitutionCapitalDirectorsShareholdersMinority RemediesDerivative ActionsTakeovers
Ordinance Core
Cap. 49
Creditor-protection legislation relevant when a business is shifted from one company to another, often operating alongside or instead of veil-piercing arguments.
PersonalityWinding UpMinority Remedies
Official guidance Core 2018
Companies Registry FAQ
Companies Registry guidance on the statutory significant controllers register regime, including registrable persons, reasonable steps, notices, and inspection.
IncorporationShareholdersPersonality
Corporate veil Foundational 1995
Court of Appeal, 11 July 1995
A foundational Hong Kong veil-piercing authority distinguishing objectionable evasion of existing legal obligations from lawful structuring that avoids obligations arising in the first place.
PersonalityWinding Up
Corporate veil and transfer of business Core 2003
[2003] 3 HKLRD 347
High Court decision on a transfer-of-business dispute where the plaintiff argued that successor companies were controlled by the same interests and used to evade liabilities.
PersonalityWinding UpMinority Remedies
Corporate veil Core 2004
[2004] 3 HKLRD 517
Court of Appeal case concerning personal liability after the business and goodwill of a judgment debtor were moved into a new company, leaving the original company unable to pay.
PersonalityDirectorsWinding Up
Corporate veil and agency Specialist 2007
[2007] 4 HKLRD 745
District Court decision useful for analysing attempts to look through common ownership, nominee arguments, undisclosed principal reasoning, and property-holding companies.
PersonalityShareholders
Corporate veil and jurisdiction Core 2012
[2012] 2 HKLRD 757
Court of Appeal decision relevant to pleading corporate-group liability, service out of jurisdiction, and the limits of treating related companies as a single economic unit.
PersonalityDirectors